Arson Investigations and Forensics

Arson Investigations and Forensics“Forensics” can be generally defined as the science of criminal investigation. Science seeks a rigorous method to create results that are reliable and can be duplicated. So, it is natural to assume that forensics are reliable and consistent. In some cases, the use of forensics in a Los Angeles criminal investigation may be called into questions. This is often the case in arson investigations.

When legitimate questions arise about the validity of a forensic technique, it is easy for law enforcement to dig in its heels and defend the forensic method. However, whenever a practitioner refuses to acknowledge errors, scientific validity is lost. Nowhere is the danger of this thinking more evident than in the last fifty years of arson forensics.

The Troubling History of Arson Science

The crime of arson involves starting a fire to burn property that is not your own, or to burn your own property to create harm to another or receive a benefit, such as through insurance payouts. The scientific method involves starting with a guess or a hunch, and then running experiments to try to prove and disprove that guess. While fire and the scientific method are not necessarily mutually exclusive, there is great expense associated with quality fire experiments and simulations, and many agencies were not willing to burn down large structures just to study them.

Hunches and guesses became knowledge and rules throughout the 1970s and 80s, and those “rules” supported convictions well into the early twenty-first century. While it can be dangerous to conduct investigations with no scientific techniques, it is much worse to use techniques that masquerade as science, when they are in truth only convenient myths. There were many theories that were taught as tell-tale signs of arson, without any testing or proof.

Multiple black burn marks on the wall of a burned down home, spots blacker than the other burned walls, meant multiple ignition points, which meant arson, because a natural fire would have only one ignition point. A meandering dark burn spot down the middle of the floor meant that an accelerant, gasoline or lighter fluid, had flowed there. A lighter flow pattern could tell the same story, as the accelerant had burned off while the underlying floor had not yet ignited. A burn pattern under a metal doorjamb meant an accelerant had flowed under the door. Spalling is the appearance of pock marks and craters in hard building materials such as concrete. They are commonly found in the aftermath of a structure fire. Spalling was taught as a marker of arson.

Bringing Heightened Scrutiny to Arson Science

Throughout the 1990s and into the 2000s there was greater willingness to create experiments involving structure fires. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms developed better techniques to test theories on the behavior of explosives and fire, as such crimes fall under their federal jurisdiction. Both insurance companies and law enforcement agencies began burning down more structures full of different materials to see firsthand the patterns that fires leave behind.

And it turned out that in a room full of furniture, a fire with one ignition point will flare up as each couch and chair is consumed, leaving multiple distinct burn marks on the wall. Old dry carpet will burn differently where it is worn and where it is not, creating patterns that were previously described as “puddling,” and “pour patterns.” Buildings expected to smolder for half an hour would be engulfed in five minutes, without the presence of any accelerant. Spalling could occur due to any sudden and intense heat source, such as a fire in a building built largely of wood. The mere expansion of moisture in concrete could pock mark the concrete.

Arson forensics in Los Angeles are improving, but there is still some folklore that survives, particularly if investigators are not regularly trained in the most recent science. And scientific questions are emerging with the identification of hair follicles, bite marks, blood spatter patterns, and many other forensic techniques that are regularly admitted in Los Angeles courtrooms. Law enforcement predictably digs in its heels when questioned. It takes a bold and knowledgeable attorney to challenge pillars of forensic investigation.

If you are facing criminal charges, it is important that you consult with a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer immediately. Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who knows how to effectively identify problematic forensics on behalf of his clients.

For more information about problems with Los Angeles criminal investigations, contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1520, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Featured on CNN
ABC News
NBC News
Los Angeles Times
CBS News
The New York Times
Us Weekly
Entertainment Tonight
Good Morning America
Legal Broadcast Network
Avvo Rating 10.0
Client Reviews
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.