What DUI Driving Patterns do Officers Look for?

What DUI Driving Patterns Do Officers Look For?The majority of DUI cases begin when a law enforcement officer on patrol pulls over a vehicle. There must be a legally valid reason for the vehicle stop and police officers are not allowed to simply pull vehicles over because it is late at night or they have a hunch that the driver is intoxicated. Under state and Federal law, the officer must have reasonable or probable cause to believe that the driver has committed a violation of the law. Typically, the violation cited will be a traffic code infraction such as speeding, running a red light or turning without signaling. However, during times that DUIs are more common, such as at nights, weekends and holidays, officers are extra vigilant for drivers who may be under the influence. They may be looking for certain driving patterns that are often associated with impaired driving.

Driving Conduct Associated With Impaired Driving

The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) has conducted numerous studies regarding impaired driving and how it effects drivers and has published statistics pertaining to specific driving conduct and likelihood of intoxication. Driving conduct that most highly correlates to impaired driving includes drivers who make wide radius turns and those who straddle lane dividers or road demarcations when driving. Extensive weaving, swerving and driving under the speed limit by 10 mph or more has been found to correlate closely with driving under the influence.

Speeding is Not Highly Indicative of Impaired Driving

People are often surprised to learn that the NHTSA has found that driving in excess of posted speed limits does not correlate closely with impaired driving. Regardless of the NHTSA findings, officers often cite speeding violations as the reason a vehicle was initially pulled over in DUI cases. After stopping the driver, the officer may come to suspect that the driver is under the influence. The officer will typically speak with the driver and looks for symptoms of intoxication such as slurred speech, bloodshot and watery eyes and an odor of alcohol. The officer may further detain the driver and request that the driver participate in field sobriety testing or provide a breath sample on the officer’s portable PAS device, both of which are voluntary. If brought to court, the defense can challenge any argument that the driver’s excessive speeding was indicative of impaired driving.

Drivers should be aware that if they were driving in excess of 100 mph and were under the influence, the prosecution can charge a speed enhancement pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23582 VC. This enhancement can add an automatic 60 day jail sentence to any underlying DUI conviction.

Challenging the Vehicle Stop

If there was insufficient reasonable or probable cause, the defense can file a motion to suppress pursuant to California Penal Code Section 1538.5 PC. In many cases, police will pull someone over after seeing them weave within a lane or touch a lane line once, which may be legally permissible. If the judge finds there was insufficient reasonable or probable cause to stop the defendant’s vehicle, the resulting DUI evidence will be suppressed. The prosecution will usually have no choice but to dismiss the case as they would be unable to proceed.

If you or a loved one have been arrested in California for a DUI offense, it is imperative that you speak with an experienced criminal DUI attorney as soon as possible. As a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience, Michael Kraut is well respected throughout the court system as a top-notch DUI litigator who does not back down from a challenge.

For more information about DUI and what driving patterns officers are looking for, and to schedule your free consultation, Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Featured on CNN
ABC News
NBC News
Los Angeles Times
CBS News
The New York Times
Us Weekly
Entertainment Tonight
Good Morning America
Legal Broadcast Network
Avvo Rating 10.0
Client Reviews
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.