DUI and Qualitative vs. Quantitative Testing

DUI and Qualitative vs. Quantitative TestingIn DUI cases involving alcohol, the law provides a 0.08 percent blood alcohol content threshold. While it is possible to be charged with DUI even with a BAC below 0.08 percent, in many cases police and prosecutors will not pursue cases with drivers whose BAC is under the legal limit. In DUI drug cases, there is no legal threshold and any amount of drug discovered in a driver’s blood sample can result in criminal charges pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(f) VC. However, qualitative testing conducted at a later date may show that there was not enough of the drug present to cause impairment. This testing is often critical in defending DUI drug cases.

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Blood Testing

Drivers who are suspected of driving under the influence of drugs will be required to take a blood test, as there is no breath test currently available that can measure for presence of drugs. While some law enforcement agencies are using a mouth swab test device, this is only considered a preliminary test. Drivers who refuse testing can still be charged with a DUI offense as well as a refusal allegation that adds mandatory jail time. In addition, the police may be able to obtain a warrant for a forced blood draw.

The results of the blood test often take several weeks and are not known at the time of arrest. The driver will not discover the results of the blood test until his or her arraignment or even later. Typically, the county crime lab or other agency conducting the blood test will run a quantitative test to determine whether or not one of several drugs is detected in the defendant’s blood sample. These drugs include marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamine, methamphetamine and other substances. The lab will typically only conduct quantitative testing to see if a drug is present in the sample. They will not usually conduct qualitative testing to determine the amount of the drug found in the defendant’s blood.

Blood Split Order and Independent Qualitative Testing

When a blood sample is collected, part of the sample is set aside and stored. The defense can obtain a blood split order to have a portion of the remaining blood taken and tested at an independent laboratory. The laboratory can perform both quantitative and qualitative analysis on the blood sample. In many cases, the amount of drugs found in the defendant’s system may not be sufficient to cause impairment.

When this is the case, the defense can use a toxicology expert who can explain the results of qualitative testing and show why the driver may not have been under the influence of drugs at the time of driving. The prosecution can provide his or her own expert to explain the effect of the drug taken. In addition, the prosecution may point to other evidence of impaired driving, such as the defendant’s driving conduct, his or her performance on field sobriety tests and the officer’s physical observations of the driver.

Since the passage of Proposition 64, which has removed many restrictions on marijuana, law enforcement expects to see an increase in driving under the influence of marijuana cases. It may be necessary to rely on qualitative testing, especially since many of the components of THC can remain in a person’s system long after the intoxicating effect of marijuana has worn off.

If you or a loved one have been arrested for DUI and want more information about the different types of blood testing, it is critical that you speak with a skilled DUI lawyer immediately. Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who understands how to effectively defend clients charged with DUI drug offenses.

For more information about DUI and qualitative and quantitative blood testing, Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Featured on CNN
ABC News
NBC News
Los Angeles Times
CBS News
The New York Times
Us Weekly
Entertainment Tonight
Good Morning America
Legal Broadcast Network
Avvo Rating 10.0
Client Reviews
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.