DUI and Double Jeopardy

A law book with a gavel - DUI LawDouble jeopardy is the legal principle that protects criminal defendants from being prosecuted twice for the same offense. Many people charged with a DUI offense in California question whether or not the restrictions against double jeopardy are violated when they face potential “punishment” from both the courts and the DMV and also when they are charged with two different DUI offenses for a single incident. For anyone arrested for a DUI incident, it is important to understand what does and does not qualify as “double jeopardy.”

The DMV Hearing and Double Jeopardy

When a person in Los Angeles is arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence, the arresting officer will take the defendant’s driver’s license and provide them with a notice of an impending license suspension. The arrest information will be forwarded to the California DMV who will then issue a license suspension 30 days later, unless the defendant requests an administrative hearing to fight the suspension.

The Administrative Per Se hearing is held before a DMV hearing officer who is neither a judge nor an attorney. The hearing officer will consider the evidence and may call witnesses as part of the hearing. The driver can be represented by counsel and can present evidence, subpoena witnesses and can testify. Ultimately, the hearing officer will determine whether or not to reinstate the license suspension or set aside (dismiss) the suspension and reinstate the driver’s driving privileges.

The administrative hearing operates independently of the criminal charges and in many cases the driver may have the administrative hearing adjudicated before criminal charges are even filed. Even if drivers win the administrative hearing, their license can be suspended if they are convicted of a DUI offense in court. Drivers often ask whether this is a “double jeopardy” violation, as they are required to defend themselves both in court and before the DMV.

Appellate courts have determined that the DMV administrative suspension is not a “penalty” or a “punishment,” but rather an administrative corrective action. Because this is not a penalty or punishment, jeopardy does not “attach” when a driver has his or her license suspended. This means that the court case, which does assess a criminal penalty, can proceed regardless of what happens with the DMV administrative suspension.

DUI and Penal Code Section 654

When a defendant is charged with DUI, the prosecutor will usually file two counts; one count of driving under the influence in violation of California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC and one count of driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or higher pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) VC. This allows the prosecution to pursue two different theories of criminal liability.

Defendants often ask how they can be charged with two different counts of DUI on a single incident. This does not qualify as “double jeopardy” and if a defendant is convicted of both DUI counts, the counts would merge in terms of sentencing under California Penal Code Section 654 PC. This means that the case would not be considered two DUI offenses and the defendant would not face double sentences. Because there is no “double punishment” the defendant can be charged with and convicted of both DUI counts without violating the “double jeopardy” clause of the United States Constitution.

If you or someone you know have been arrested for DUI in Los Angles, it is critical that you go over your case with a knowledgeable DUI attorney as soon as possible. Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who works hard to make sure his clients receive the most effective representation possible both in court and before the DMV.

For more information about DUI and double jeopardy, and to schedule your free consultation, contact Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Client Reviews
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs!
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire.
★★★★★
Brad
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny.
★★★★★
Lida
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer.
★★★★★
Daniel Lepervanche
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us.
★★★★★
A.N.