Search Warrants

Gavel and handcuffs with red legal book

Many felony charges in Los Angeles rely on evidence obtained through the execution of a search warrant. Search warrants must be granted by a judge and allow the police to search a person’s home, car, office or other private area for evidence of illegal conduct. The warrant additionally allows the police to seize any evidence of illegal conduct that is found during execution of the warrant. Unless the police have consent to search or if a search falls into a legally recognized exception to the search warrant rule, the officer must have a search warrant before he or she can enter or search a person’s home, car or place of business.

A search warrant must be authorized and signed by a judge. Typically, an officer will go to a judge and present a search warrant to be signed. The warrant would include a sworn affidavit from the officer regarding the probable cause justifying the search. Probable cause is a legal standard that requires a showing that the officer has a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and that evidence of that crime would be found during the search. In many cases, the officer’s affidavit will rely on information from a confidential informant. In these cases, the judge would require the officer to provide evidence regarding the reliability of the informant.

Search warrants are often used in drug cases and white collar offenses. The officer can request to search and seize items such as computers, bank records and office files. In many cases, a criminal suspect will first become aware that he or she is under investigation when officers show up at his or her door with a search warrant and various items are removed from the premises.

If the defendant is ultimately charged with a crime, there may be ways to challenge the warrant and suppress the evidence that was seized. The defense can file a motion to quash and traverse a warrant. A traversal motion challenges the truth of the information in the affidavit that was submitted to the signing judge. A motion to quash challenges the sufficiency of the evidence presented in the affidavit. There are different types of hearings that can be held when the defense challenges a search warrant. In a Franks hearing, the judge would determine whether or not the affidavit included false information. A Luttenberger hearing is held where the defense claims that the informant provided false information. And a Hobbs hearing will be held where the defense is requesting that the identity of a confidential informant be revealed.

There are certain rules pertaining to how a search warrant is executed. Under the law, a search warrant must be executed within 10 days of being issued. After 10 days have lapsed, the warrant becomes void. If the warrant becomes void, the judge can reissue the warrant if it is still supported by probable cause. Generally, a search warrant can only be executed between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. If the officer wants to execute the warrant outside of this timeframe, he or she would have to show good cause for the exception. In addition, there is a “knock-notice” rule which requires officers to knock or announce their presence before entering. There are exceptions and in certain circumstances an officer can enter a building or home without knocking.

If you have been charged with a crime or are under investigation and a search warrant has been served, it is crucial that you speak with a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer right away. As a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience, Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut understands this complex area of the law and is highly skilled at litigating issues pertaining to search warrants.

For more information about Los Angeles search warrants, and to schedule your free consultation, contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan Thomas
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel Lepervanche
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.