995 Motions

Judge with gavel

After a defendant has been held to answer following a preliminary hearing on a felony offense, the case will be sent to a trial court within 15 days. At this point the defendant will be re-arraigned on the felony information that the prosecution is required to file. After the information has been filed, the defense can file a motion pursuant to California Penal Code Section 995 PC requesting that the judge dismiss any count to which the defendant was incorrectly held to answer. The 995 motion is critical for the defense and may lead to charges being dismissed or significantly reduced.

After a defendant has been held to answer and is re-arraigned, defense counsel will be provided a copy of the preliminary hearing transcript. This transcript often is an extremely important factor in any 995 motion, as this is the evidence that the trial judge will review when considering the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Under California Penal Code Section 995 PC, the information (or individual counts of the information) will be set aside where the defendant was not legally committed or where the defendant was committed without probable cause.

A defendant is not considered to be legally committed where he or she was denied a basic right during the preliminary hearing. This can include the right to be represented by an attorney, the right to a speedy preliminary hearing, the right to a continuous preliminary hearing and the right to cross-examine the People’s witnesses and present defense witnesses. Additionally, the defense may argue that a defendant was not legally committed where the case fell beyond the statute of limitations or was otherwise not legally valid.

The defense may also challenge the sufficiency of the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing. The standard of proof at the preliminary hearing is lower than it is at a criminal trial. A defendant’s guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in order to be convicted at trial, however the People must only prove that there was “probable cause” to believe the defendant committed the charged offenses in order to be held to answer at preliminary hearing. The probable cause standard is much lower and only requires a showing that would lead an ordinary person to believe and entertain a strong suspicion that the defendant is guilty of the charged crime.

Even with this lower standard, there may be cases where the Court finds that there was insufficient probable cause to hold the defendant to answer. This is often the case where the prosecution failed to prove each element of the offense charged or where the People’s witnesses were shown to be untrustworthy or unreliable. In these cases, the Court’s later review of the preliminary hearing transcript in light of the defense’s 995 motion may lead the Court to find that there was insufficient probable cause to hold the defendant to answer.

A 995 motion can challenge individual counts in a complaint or information as well as misdemeanor counts that have been filed, penalty enhancements and special circumstances allegations.

If the Court grants the defendant’s 995 motion, the prosecution can refile the charges in a new felony complaint. However, there is a general “two dismissal” rule which states that the prosecutor cannot refile felony charges that have been dismissed twice. If the 995 motion is granted to all counts of the information, any bail posted by the defendant must be returned. If the prosecutor opts to refile charges within that 15-day period, the bail that was previously posted must be applied to cover the refiled offense.

If the Court denies the defendant’s 995 motion, the defense may file a writ of mandate requesting an immediate appellate review of the Court’s denial. This writ is only available if the 995 motion is filed within 60 days of the defendant’s arraignment on the information. Otherwise, the defendant would have to wait until after the case has resolved at trial before challenging the 995 ruling in an appeal.

If you have been charged with a felony offense or have recently been held to answer at your preliminary hearing, it is imperative that you consult with a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney right away. Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who understands how to effectively litigate 995 motions.

For more information about Los Angeles 995 motions, contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs!
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel Lepervanche
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.