Motions to Suppress

motion to suppress

In Los Angeles, a motion to suppress evidence can result in all evidence used against the defendant being thrown out. This motion will be granted in cases where the judge determines that the evidence was not legally obtained and therefore cannot be used against the defendant. Usually, when the judge grants a defendant’s motion to suppress, the prosecution will be unable to move forward with their case and will have no choice but to dismiss the charges.

Under California Penal Code Section 1538.5 PC, the defense can make a motion to suppress evidence that was unlawfully obtained. Under the law, unlawfully obtained evidence can include evidence that was discovered without a search warrant as the result of an unreasonable search and/or seizure or evidence obtained with a warrant where the warrant was legally deficient, the evidence was not what was described in the warrant, the warrant was issued without probable cause or the search was conducted in a manner that violated the United States or California Constitution.

A motion to suppress evidence is usually heard during a pretrial hearing. For felony level offenses, the motion to suppress evidence can also be heard at the same time as the defendant’s preliminary hearing.

Even though the motion to suppress evidence is filed by the defense, the burden of proof would be on the prosecutor to establish that a warrantless search was reasonable. However, if a warrant had been obtained, the warrant is presumed to be legal and the defense bears the burden of showing that the warrant was not legal. The standard of proof for a motion to suppress evidence is “preponderance of the evidence.” This means that whatever side has the burden of proof must show that it is more likely than not their position is correct.

In order for a defendant to be able to challenge the validity of a search, he or she must be able to show that there was a valid expectation of privacy in the location that was searched. If the defendant lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy, he or she would not have standing to challenge the search. Places that a defendant has been found to have a reasonable expectation of privacy include the defendant’s home, car, cellphone, school locker and hotel room. Courts have found that no expectation of privacy exists in a person’s garbage (which can be searched without a warrant or reasonable cause), a car which the defendant has stolen or a car that the defendant is a passenger in.

Many motion to suppress hearings are argued in cases where there was an unlawful traffic stop. In California, an officer must have reasonable cause to believe that a driver is in violation of the law before that officer can justify pulling the driver over. If the officer is found to have lacked reasonable cause to stop the vehicle, all evidence deriving from the traffic stop will be suppressed. This would include any narcotics that were found during a subsequent search of the vehicle as well as any blood or breath evidence taken from the defendant if he or she is ultimately arrested for driving under the influence.

At the suppression hearing, the prosecution will present witnesses and evidence that supports its position. Generally, the officer who conducted the questionable search or executed the warrant will be called to testify. The defense will have a chance to cross-examine this witness and challenge his or her statements. The defense can also call its own witnesses and the defendant would have an opportunity to testify at the suppression hearing. In many cases, the judge will ask questions of the witnesses during the presentation of evidence. After witnesses have testified, the prosecution and defense are permitted to present oral arguments. The judge will then decide whether or not to grant the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. If the defendant’s motion to suppress is denied, there are limited situations where he or she would be able to file a writ with the Court of Appeals and request that the criminal proceedings be stayed while the decision on the suppression motion is appealed.

If you are facing criminal charges, it is important that you consult with a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Lawyer immediately. Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who knows how to effectively litigate suppression motions on behalf of his clients.

For more information about Los Angeles motions to suppress, contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1520, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Featured on CNN
ABC News
NBC News
Los Angeles Times
CBS News
The New York Times
Us Weekly
Entertainment Tonight
Good Morning America
Legal Broadcast Network
Avvo Rating 10.0
Client Reviews
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.