Los Angeles DUI vs. Wet Reckless

DUI vs. Wet RecklessFor some defendants who have been charged with DUI, the prosecution may consider resolving the case by allowing the defendant to plead to a reduced DUI charge. This may be the case where there is a problem of proof or the defendant’s BAC was relatively low. One of the most common reduced DUI charges is “wet reckless” under California Vehicle Code Section 23103/23103.5 VC. It is important to understand the difference between wet reckless and DUI and what type of consequences each charge may carry.

What is a “Wet Reckless” Charge?

Wet reckless is an unusual charge in that a prosecutor cannot initially charge a defendant with “wet reckless.” Instead, a DUI charge can be reduced to wet reckless as part of a plea agreement. Under California Vehicle Code Section 23103 VC, reckless driving is a misdemeanor offense involving unsafe driving conduct. The law provides for a sentencing provision under California Vehicle Code Section 23103.5 VC indicating that there was alcohol involved in the reckless driving offense, hence the term “wet reckless.”

Differences Between Wet Reckless and DUI

There are a number of key differences between DUI convictions and convictions for wet reckless. First and foremost, a wet reckless conviction is not a DUI, and may not trigger the same consequences that a DUI conviction would have with employers or licensing agencies. The defendant can honestly state that he or she was convicted of reckless driving and this is the conviction that would appear on his or her criminal background check. This difference can often be critical.

Unlike a DUI conviction which will trigger an automatic driver’s license suspension and will require defendants convicted in Los Angeles County to have an Ignition Interlock Device (“IID”) installed in their vehicles, a wet reckless conviction will not trigger a driver’s license suspension. It is important to remember that the DMV may still issue an administrative driver’s license suspension regardless of what happens in court. For a first time DUI offender, the suspension period is four months however the driver would be eligible for a restricted license after a 30 day hard suspension.

Drivers convicted of wet reckless would not need to have an IID installed in their vehicles. However wet reckless convictions will add two points to the defendant’s driving record. This may cause drivers to lose their “good driver” discount and may cause insurance rates to go up. In addition, the fines associated with wet reckless are typically lower and the maximum jail is significantly lower. The maximum jail time on a wet reckless conviction is 90 days, while a first time DUI offender can be sentenced to serve up to six months in jail.

Wet Reckless and Enhanceability of Future Offenses

Unlike other reduced DUI charges such as “dry reckless” or exhibition of speed, wet reckless charges are unique in that they count as “prior DUI offenses” if a defendant is charged with a subsequent DUI offense and can be used to enhance penalties. The prosecutor can allege prior DUI convictions as penalty enhancements on new charges that occurred within the previous ten years. For charging purposes, wet reckless convictions under California Vehicle Code Section 23103/23103.5 VC would qualify as “prior convictions” and can lead to mandatory jail sentences and other enhanced penalties.

If you or a loved one have been arrested for DUI and want more information about wet reckless and other reduced DUI charges, it is critical that you meet with an experienced DUI attorney as soon as possible. Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who understands what is at stake and works hard to put his clients in the best position possible.

For more information about Los Angeles DUI and wet reckless offenses, and to schedule your free consultation, contact Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan Thomas
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel Lepervanche
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.