Close

Former Senior LA Prosecutor.
Harvard Law School Educated.
Now Providing an Aggressive Defense For You.

Possession of a Controlled Substance for Sale Defense Attorney in Los Angeles

Under California’s shifting landscape of drug law reform, one truth remains constant: possessing a controlled substance with the intent to sell is still treated as a serious felony. Proposition 47, approved by voters in 2014, reclassified many simple‐possession offenses as misdemeanors. Still, the initiative left Health & Safety Code (HSC) §11351 and §11378, the statutes that outlaw possession for sale, fully intact. A conviction carries prison exposure, life-altering collateral consequences, and, for non-citizens, severe immigration risks. If you or a loved one is under investigation, early and informed legal intervention may spell the difference between freedom and a felony record. If you have been arrested for possession with intent to sell a controlled substance, it is crucial that you speak with a drug crimes attorney with significant experience in defending drug cases.

Understanding California’s Drug Laws: HSC §11351 and §11378 for Possession with Intent to Sell

HSC §11351 makes it a felony to possess for sale opiates and opiate derivatives (such as heroin, OxyContin®, hydrocodone, and fentanyl), cocaine base and powder, peyote, LSD, and certain “designer” substances. Separate but parallel, HSC §11378 covers methamphetamine, MDMA/ecstasy, GHB, ketamine, and a range of Schedule III and Schedule IV stimulants or depressants. Prosecutors often charge both statutes when multiple drugs are seized. They may also file enhancement counts under HSC §11352 (sale or transportation), Penal Code §12022 (firearms during a felony), and HSC §11370.4 (heavy‐weight enhancements) if the evidence supports those allegations.

What Drugs Are Classified as Controlled Substances in California?

California adopts the federal Controlled Substances Act schedules but adds state-specific classifications. Cocaine, heroin, fentanyl and its analogs, oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, codeine, vicodin, methamphetamine, MDMA, LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, and numerous prescription medications are all controlled substances. A valid prescription is insufficient; you must possess the drug in the prescribed form and quantity. Any deviation, such as tablets removed from their pharmacy bottle, can invite suspicion that the medicine was diverted.

Elements the State Must Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

To convict under either statute, the prosecution must establish that the accused:

  • Possessed or exercised control over the substance
  • Knew of its presence
  • Knew of its nature as a controlled substance
  • Possessed a usable quantity (trace “residue” alone is insufficient)
  • And specifically intended to sell or furnish the substance when it was possessed. Possession may be actual (drug in a pocket), constructive (drug hidden in a bedroom safe), or joint (shared stash controlled by multiple people). Still, casual proximity without control will not suffice.
How Prosecutors Prove Intent to Sell Drugs in Los Angeles

The most litigated element is intent. Rarely do prosecutors possess a confession or a recorded statement such as “I was selling heroin.” Instead, they invite jurors to infer intent from surrounding facts, large quantities divided into bindles, heat-sealed baggies, digital scales, vacant glassine envelopes, pay/owe sheets, ledgers, or text messages discussing pricing (“2 for 40”). California appellate cases like People v. Parra (1999) and People v. McChristian (1966) affirm that expert testimony interpreting such factors is admissible to show how dealers package, advertise, and deliver narcotics. The absence of paraphernalia for personal use (pipes, syringes, foil) is likewise argued as circumstantial proof of sales.

How Digital Evidence Like Text Messages and Apps Can Impact Drug Cases

Twenty-first-century drug cases are increasingly built on smartphones and cloud data. Search warrants routinely authorize forensic dumps of call logs, encrypted messaging apps, GPS histories, Venmo or Cash App receipts, and social-media posts that can map out a delivery route or reveal pricing. Even deleted chats often live on servers. Early retention of a defense team skilled in digital forensics can expose flaws in extraction protocols and privacy violations, paving the way for suppression or a credibility attack on the officers.

Potential Penalties and Sentencing for Possession of Drugs with Intent to Sell

A first-time violation of HSC §11351 is punishable by two, three, or four years in county jail under California’s Realignment Act, plus up to a $20,000 fine. HSC §11378 carries 16 months, two years, or three years. Felony probation is discretionary but unavailable if the court finds the defendant falls under Penal Code §1203.073 (non-probation provisions for significant weight or prior convictions). Heavy-weight enhancements under HSC §11370.4 add three years for one or more kilograms, five years for four or more kilograms, ten years for ten or more kilograms, 15 years for 20 or more kilograms, and 25 years for 80 or more kilograms, each enhancement stacked consecutively. Selling within 1,000 feet of a school or involving a minor invokes HSC §11353.6 and can drive total exposure into double-digit years.

The Life-Altering Consequences of a Possession with Intent to Sell Conviction

Beyond time behind bars, a possession-for-sale conviction triggers a web of civil penalties: state asset forfeiture under HSC §11470, lifetime firearm prohibitions, barriers to state licensing boards (medical, nursing, real estate, law), housing hardship, and employment discrimination despite Ban-the-Box laws. Under the Immigration & Nationality Act, any trafficking conviction renders a non-citizen deportable and permanently inadmissible, even lawful permanent residents. A drug sale felony also postpones license eligibility under Vehicle Code §13202.5 and can derail federal student-loan funding.

Common Defenses Against Possession for Sale Charges in California
  • Personal Use. The defense may concede possession but argue the stash was for individual consumption. Expert witnesses highlight tolerance levels, user paraphernalia, and the impracticality of street-level packaging for one’s habit.
  • Valid Prescription. When the substance is a Schedule II or III medication, proving a legitimate script can dissolve the charge, though the amount and manner of possession must align with therapeutic use.
  • Lack of Knowledge. If another person hid drugs in a borrowed car or suitcase, the accused lacked the necessary intent and knowledge.
  • Entrapment. Under People v. Barraza (1979), police may provide an opportunity to commit a crime, but they may not overbear a normally law-abiding person’s will. Aggressive informant tactics in controlled buys are fertile ground for an entrapment motion.
  • Illegal Search and Seizure. A defective traffic stop, stale or overbroad warrant, or warrantless cell-phone search contravening Riley v. California can lead to suppression under Penal Code §1538.5. When the original warrant affidavit contains reckless falsehoods, a Franks hearing may excise the tainted assertions and vitiate probable cause.
  • Chain of Custody & Lab Error. Laboratories sometimes mislabel exhibits, misidentify substances, or employ protocols that fail the Kelly/Frye reliability standard. Any analytical misstep can create reasonable doubt on both identity and weight.
Pre-Trial Motions and Legal Strategies in Possession for Sale Cases

Effective defense extends beyond the trial itself. A timely Pitchess motion can uncover prior acts of dishonesty or excessive force by arresting officers. Bail-reduction hearings or non-monetary release petitions under Humphreys allow clients to fight the case without custody. Defense investigators canvass surveillance cameras, ride body-cam time stamps, and collect witness statements before memories fade. When appropriate, an early confession of judgment under Penal Code §17(b)(3) may convert the felony to a misdemeanor at sentencing, dramatically reducing exposure.

Alternatives to a Felony Conviction in Drug Sales Cases in California

If the evidence supports a reduction to simple possession (HSC §11350 or §11377), diversion under Penal Code §1000 or Proposition 36 allows treatment in lieu of conviction. Mental-health diversion (§1001.36) and veterans diversion (§1001.80) offer bespoke rehabilitation where a qualifying disorder or service-related trauma contributed to the alleged conduct. For those already convicted before Proposition 47, Penal Code §1170.18 authorizes resentencing or redesignation to a misdemeanor, facilitating expungement under §1203.4 and potential record sealing (§851.91).

How Early Legal Intervention Can Prevent Drug Charges in Los Angeles

Many of the most successful outcomes occur before a single charge is filed. Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc. frequently opens a line of communication with the filing deputy district attorney, presents negative lab results, arranges private polygraphs, or produces prescription documents, persuading prosecutors to reject or file lesser counts. Rapid retention also permits controlled surrender arrangements, eliminating the embarrassment of a public arrest and ensuring favorable bail conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions About Possession with Intent to Sell Charges

Q: “Is there a minimum weight to prove intent to sell?”

No. The state must show the quantity was usable, but even a few grams divided into multiple baggies can satisfy the element if the surrounding facts support sales.

Q: “Can police read my text messages without a warrant?”

Generally, no. Post-Riley, officers must obtain a warrant before searching digital content unless an exigent circumstance exists.

Q: “Will federal prosecutors take my case?”

Federal adoption is rare unless the quantity is substantial, weapons are involved, or interstate commerce is evident. However, Homeland Security investigations may run parallel when fentanyl analogs or darknet sales are suspected.

Why Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc. is Different

Founding attorney Michael Kraut is a former Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney with more than 14 years of prosecutorial experience and a Harvard Law School pedigree. His insider knowledge of the District Attorney’s charging criteria, narcotics-unit practices, and local judicial tendencies has helped hundreds of clients avoid incarceration or secure dismissals. The firm brings retired law-enforcement investigators, certified criminalists, and digital forensic experts to challenge every link in the prosecution’s chain. Named a Southern California Super Lawyer with a 10.0 rating on Avvo, Mr. Kraut is a frequent media legal analyst and a trusted voice in the Los Angeles criminal-defense community. Offices are conveniently located near the Criminal Courts Building (CJC) downtown, with satellite meeting spaces in Burbank, Glendale, Pasadena, Long Beach, and the South Bay.

Take Control of Your Defense Today

A single allegation of possessing drugs for sale can jeopardize your freedom, career, and reputation. Every hour that passes risks losing evidence and hardening prosecution positions. The content on this page is general and does not constitute legal advice; no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading it. For guidance tailored to your circumstances, speak directly with a qualified lawyer.

To arrange a confidential, no-obligation consultation with Michael Kraut at Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc., visit our main office at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1520, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Call 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453 or use our secure online form, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.
Contact Us