Close

Former Senior LA Prosecutor.
Harvard Law School Educated.
Now Providing an Aggressive Defense For You.

Possessing Drug Manufacturing Materials Defense Attorney in Los Angeles

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, local police agencies, and multi-agency federal task forces have intensified their focus on clandestine drug laboratories in Southern California. Whether the target is a sprawling desert “super-lab” or a single-room apartment operation in Echo Park, investigators do not need to catch a person in the middle of a “cook” to file serious felony charges. Simply possessing certain chemicals, glassware, or pieces of specialized equipment with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, phencyclidine (PCP), or other controlled substances can lead to arrest and prosecution under California’s Health & Safety Code. If you or someone you know has been charged with possessing drug manufacturing material, you must meet with an experienced drug crimes attorney right away.

This page explains the law, potential sentences, enhancements, common defenses, and what to expect in court when you are accused of possessing drug-manufacturing materials in Los Angeles. It is provided by Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc., for general information only and is not a substitute for a confidential consultation with legal counsel. Contact us immediately for strategic, results-oriented representation if you or a loved one has been arrested.

What California Law Says About Drug Manufacturing Materials (§§ 11383 and 11383.5)

California Health & Safety Code §§ 11383 and 11383.5 make it a felony to possess specific chemical “precursors”, the building blocks necessary to synthesize controlled substances, while intending to use them to produce illicit drugs. Although the statutory lists are extensive, prosecutors most frequently rely on these groupings:

  • Piperidine or pyrrolidine paired with cyclohexanone is a class precursor to PCP.
  • Methylamine or ethylamine in combination with phenyl-2-propanone (P2P), key ingredients for methamphetamine.
  • Ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, nor-pseudoephedrine, N-methylephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine when accompanied by hydriodic acid, red phosphorus, iodine crystals, or another reducing agent.

The decisive element is not merely ownership of a chemical, but the simultaneous possession of one or more listed substances, either alone or in a mixture, together with the specific intent to use them for drug production. A licensed pharmacist who stores ephedrine under a Board of Pharmacy permit is not criminally liable; a person who stockpiles cold medicine and red phosphorus boxes in a storage unit likely is.

How Prosecutors Prove Intent to Manufacture Drugs in Los Angeles Cases

To secure a conviction, the District Attorney must establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused:

  • Exercised control over the chemical (actual, constructive, or joint possession).
  • Knew of the substance’s presence and its chemical nature.
  • Intended to manufacture methamphetamine, PCP, or an analog listed in § 11055.

“Intent” is often inferred from circumstantial evidence—multiple bulk purchases of pseudoephedrine at different pharmacies, glassware coated with chemical residue, instruction manuals downloaded from the dark web, or text messages arranging a forthcoming “cook.” Even when chemicals are found in a warehouse miles away, prosecutors may argue constructive possession if rent receipts, fingerprints, or surveillance footage link the accused to the location.

Felony Penalties for Possessing Drug Manufacturing Materials in California

Possession of drug-manufacturing materials is always filed as a felony. The basic triad of punishment is two, four, or six years in custody under Penal Code § 1170(h). Because the offense falls within California’s realignment scheme, a sentence can be served in the Los Angeles County jail rather than state prison, and the judge may impose a “split sentence” that combines jail time with mandatory supervision.

Aggravating Factors That Increase Drug Manufacturing Sentences
  • Minor-Present Enhancement. Up to two additional years if the chemicals were possessed where a child under sixteen was present or resided.
  • Great Bodily Injury to a Minor. An extra five years if a child suffers substantial injury due to the offense (for example, a flash fire during an attempted cook).
  • Environmental Endangerment Penalties. Dumping hazardous waste in the Los Angeles River basin, Angeles National Forest, or a residential neighborhood can result in consecutive punishments under Health & Safety Code § 12000.

The court may also impose fines of up to $50,000, order the forfeiture of laboratory equipment, and require reimbursement for hazardous-material cleanup. When granted, probation typically includes search conditions, narcotics-offender registration, and mandatory counseling or drug treatment.

Immigration, Licensing, and Gun Rights After a Drug Manufacturing Conviction

A conviction under §§ 11383 or 11383.5 is considered an aggravated felony and a crime involving moral turpitude for immigration purposes, often leading to removal proceedings and permanent bars to naturalization. Professionals such as nurses, teachers, real estate brokers, or contractors face disciplinary action and possible license revocation. Felony drug convictions trigger a lifetime firearm ban, and family-court judges may cite the offense when making custody determinations.

How Los Angeles Authorities Investigate Drug Manufacturing Materials Cases

Local law enforcement works closely with the Los Angeles High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) task force, the California Department of Justice Clandestine Laboratory Unit, and the California Board of Pharmacy. Pharmacies must log sales of pseudoephedrine products; suspicious purchase patterns trigger automated alerts. Detectives may employ:

  • Controlled purchases by undercover officers or confidential informants.
  • Trash pulls to locate chemical packaging or recipe notes.
  • Power-usage subpoenas and thermal-imaging scans to spot high-heat laboratory activity.
  • Search warrants supported by chemist affidavits explaining the precursor chemicals found.

Once chemicals are seized, crime-lab analysts perform qualitative and quantitative tests. Reagents, glassware, pH meters, vent-hood filters, and notebooks often form the backbone of the prosecution’s intent argument.

Legal Defenses to Drug Manufacturing Materials Charges in California

Every case is fact-specific, but experienced counsel from Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc. routinely deploys the following strategies:

  • Fourth-Amendment Motion to Suppress. If the chemicals were found during a warrantless entry, an unlawful traffic stop, or an overbroad execution of a search warrant, a Penal Code § 1538.5 motion can lead to exclusion of the evidence. Without the chemicals, the prosecution’s case collapses.
  • Lack of Intent or Legitimate Purpose. The statutes criminalize possession with intent to manufacture. A chemistry graduate student, industrial cleaner, or pharmaceutical researcher may lawfully possess the same substances. Receipts, academic transcripts, purchase orders, or testimony from supervisors can neutralize allegations of illicit purpose.
  • No Knowledge of Presence. Constructive-possession cases hinge on proof that the defendant knew the items were there. When multiple roommates share a garage or storage locker, prosecutors struggle to attribute exclusive knowledge to anyone.
  • Entrapment. Aggressive sting operations sometimes cross the line, mainly when undercover agents supply both the chemicals and the idea for manufacturing. Demonstrating that law enforcement induced an otherwise law-abiding citizen can secure dismissal or acquittal.
  • Mistake of Fact. Clients occasionally purchase mislabeled chemicals online, believing them benign solvents or automotive degreasers. A good-faith lack of awareness undermines the requisite criminal intent.
Pre-Trial Strategies and Plea Negotiations in Manufacturing Material Cases

Early intervention is crucial. A well-researched motion to dismiss under Penal Code § 995 can convince a judge that probable cause is lacking after the preliminary hearing. Demonstrating defects in the chain of custody, contamination in the crime-lab process, or ambiguity in pharmacy logs puts pressure on the District Attorney to offer reduced charges, sometimes a wobbler such as Health & Safety Code § 11366.8 (possessing a false compartment).

Deferred-entry drug programs under Penal Code § 1000 or Proposition 36 generally do not apply because §§ 11383 and § 11383.5 are excluded offenses. Nevertheless, mental-health diversion under Penal Code § 1001.36, veterans’ diversion under § 1001.80, or a carefully structured “open plea” for probation remain viable in select cases.

Sentencing Alternatives and Expungement After Conviction

If probation is secured, judges frequently order:

  • Residential or outpatient substance-abuse treatment.
  • Community service with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control.
  • Restitution for environmental cleanup.
  • Random search and drug testing.

Upon successful completion of probation, clients may petition for expungement under Penal Code § 1203.4, which changes the plea to “not guilty” and dismisses the case. Although expungement does not restore firearm rights or eliminate immigration consequences, it improves background-check results and employability.

For those who serve a county jail sentence, a split sentence can release them to community supervision after as little as one-third of the custodial term, allowing them to enroll in vocational training instead of idle incarceration.

Federal Drug Manufacturing Charges and How They Differ from California Law

Possessing precursor chemicals can also violate 21 U.S.C. § 841(c). The U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Central District of California occasionally “adopts” large-quantity cases or matters involving interstate or international chemical shipments. Federal sentencing guidelines base offense levels on the amount of controlled substance that could have been produced, frequently resulting in far harsher exposure. Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc. is prepared to negotiate with both state and federal prosecutors to seek concurrent sentences or other favorable resolutions.

Why Choose Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc.?

Lead attorney Michael Kraut served for over 14 years as a Deputy District Attorney in Los Angeles County. He understands the charging criteria, lab-chemist testimony, and negotiation culture inside the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center, the Van Nuys Courthouse, and every branch courthouse in the county. Our multidisciplinary defense team includes:

  • Former narcotics detectives who dissect police procedures.
  • Forensic chemists who replicate laboratory analyses and expose contamination.
  • Licensed investigators who locate impeachment witnesses and alternate suspects.
  • Immigration counsel who mitigate removal risks for non-citizen clients.

We combine meticulous factual investigation with sophisticated legal motions to ensure that each client’s case achieves the best possible dismissal, reduction, or sentencing outcome.

Charged with Possessing Drug Manufacturing Materials? Contact a Los Angeles Defense Attorney Now

Charges for possessing drug-manufacturing materials move quickly. Bail may be set under the Los Angeles County Felony Bail Schedule; search-and-hazardous-substance cleanup costs accumulate daily; and prosecutors often seek early plea commitments. Engaging seasoned counsel at the investigation stage can prevent arrest warrants, safeguard constitutional rights, and position you for a favorable result.

Your freedom, reputation, and future matter. Put a former prosecutor on your side.

For more information about charges under Health & Safety Code §§ 11383 and 11383.5, and to schedule your free, confidential consultation, contact Michael Kraut at Kraut Law Group Criminal & DUI Lawyers, Inc., located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1520, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.
Contact Us