California Vehicle Code Section 23612 VC: Refusal Enhancement

Los Angeles DUI1. Definition and Elements of the Offenserefusal enhancement

Under California’s implied consent law, all drivers are required to submit to chemical testing if arrested on suspicion of DUI. Those who refuse testing can still be charged with driving under the influence pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC, however they would also be subject to the refusal enhancement under California Vehicle Code Section 23612 VC which would increase penalties on any conviction.

In order for this enhancement to be imposed, the People must prove the following elements supplemental to those required for the underlying DUI charge:

  1. A peace officer asked the defendant to submit to a chemical test to determine his or her blood alcohol content or whether he or she had consumed drugs.
  2. The peace officer fully advised the defendant of the requirement to submit to a test and the consequences of not submitting to a test
  3. The defendant willfully refused to submit to a test
  4. AND the peace officer lawfully arrested the defendant and had reasonable cause to believe that defendant was driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

To have fully advised the defendant, a peace officer must have told him or her all of the following:

  1. That he or she may choose a breath or blood test and may be required to submit to blood testing if he or she consumed drugs.
  2. That he or she does not have the right to have an attorney present before saying whether or not he or she will submit to a test, during the decision of which test to take, and during the administration of the test.
  3. That if he or she refuses to submit to a test, the refusal may be used against him or her in court.
  4. That failure to submit to testing will result in a fine and mandatory imprisonment if convicted of DUI
  5. AND failure to submit to testing will result in an automatic driver’s license suspension of one year or a revocation of driving privileges for two or three years.

Submitting to the PAS test does not satisfy a DUI defendant’s requirement to submit to chemical testing and would not prevent a subsequent refusal enhancement. The officer must ensure that the defendant is able to hear and comprehend the admonition. However, where the defendant’s own conduct or intoxication prevents comprehension of the admonition, he or she would still be held responsible for any subsequent refusal.

When the defendant, through no fault of his or her own, is incapable of understanding the admonition or of submitting to the test, the defendant cannot be penalized for refusing.

2. Related Offenses

Similar offenses include the following:

  1. Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol and/or Drugs - California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC
  2. Driving with a Blood Alcohol Content of 0.08 Percent or Higher - California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) VC
  3. DUI Causing InjuryCalifornia Vehicle Code Section 23153 VC
3. Examples

A man is stopped by police after he is observed committing several Vehicle Code violations while driving. The man fails all field sobriety tests and provides a PAS test with a BAC in excess of 0.20 percent. He is arrested and brought to the police station where he is read the DUI admonishment. However, the man is so intoxicated that he does not understand the admonishment and does not agree to testing. The man could still be charged with DUI in violation of California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) VC and the refusal enhancement pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 23612 VC. The fact that he could not understand the admonishment because he was so intoxicated would not be a valid defense. Additionally, the fact that he submitted to testing on the PAS device would not satisfy his requirement to submit to chemical testing under California’s implied consent laws.

4. Defenses to the Refusal Enhancement

As described above, if the defendant was unable to understand or hear the admonishment due to factors outside of his or her control, he or she cannot be held responsible for the subsequent refusal. Thus where there is external noise, such as radio traffic from an officer’s vehicle, that prevents the defendant from fully hearing the admonishment or if he or she is unconscious, the refusal enhancement would not apply.

5. Penalties

The refusal enhancement will add the following penalties to someone convicted of DUI:

  1. For a person’s first DUI, the refusal enhancement adds two days in jail, the 9-month alcohol program and a one year driver’s suspension with no ability to get a restricted license.
  2. If it is the defendant’s second DUI, the refusal enhancement would add an extra 96 hours in jail and he or she would be subject to a two year driver’s license revocation without the ability to qualify for a restricted license.
  3. For someone’s third DUI, the refusal enhancement adds 10 days in jail and a three year license revocation without the possibility of a restricted license.
6. Criminal Defense for Los Angeles DUI Refusals

If you have been charged with a DUI offense in Los Angeles and there is an additional refusal allegation, it is critical that you speak with a Los Angeles DUI Attorney immediately. Los Angeles DUI Attorney Michael Kraut is a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience who is highly regarded throughout the court system as a skilled litigator who knows how to effectively fight DUI cases. Mr. Kraut works hard to ensure his clients receive the best outcome possible and avoid devastating penalty enhancements.

For more information about the refusal enhancement, and to schedule your free consultation, contact Los Angeles DUI Lawyer Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Client Reviews
He gave me the peace of mind that my DUI case was going to be resolved. He fought for what it was needed and helped me by answering all my questions. Mike is not an average attorney. He’s a very experienced, honest and straightforward person that is there for you!
★★★★★
I hired Attorney Mike Kraut and I'm am so happy and grateful that I did! I was arrested for a DUI because my BAC level was over the .08 limit. I ended up getting a wet and reckless instead of a DUI. I still have to do some classes and I'm on probation, but I do not have a DUI on my record. If you have a DUI hire Attorney Kraut, he definitely knows his stuff!
★★★★★
Avvo User
There aren't enough positive words to write about Mike, but let me be clear that this is the only lawyer worth hiring in Los Angeles. Mike is professional, caring, and an absolute champion at winning in court.
★★★★★
Kyle, Avvo User
Mike Kraut is not a typical lawyer. He is a straightforward person with a true heart and a sympathetic ear. He is also smart and connected and he cares about the people who seek out his help. He got my son out of a jam. He did it quickly and painlessly. I recommend Mike Kraut to anyone that needs his services.
Thank you Mike for helping my son.
★★★★★
Mark, Avvo User
Michael Kraut is a rock star lawyer. I was really happy and satisfied with the results I received from Michael and his team. A few months back I was being accused of a serious felony. Mike gave me sound legal advice and worked diligently to clear my name. Mike was great at always keeping me updated and returning calls. Great, great lawyer I cant say enough about this man!
★★★★★
Eric, Google User
How can I express how relieved and pleased I am with Michael's professional abilities to have my Felony brought down to a misdameanor to a possible dismissal with deferment. With his care my life has been turned around and cannot say how helpful he's been not only in my case but life. He, himself has changed how I view criminal lawyers. Thank you so much Michael!
★★★★★
Owen, Google User