Los Angeles Pitchess Motions

Justice-wooden gavel

As part of the pretrial process for a defendant who has been charged with a felony or misdemeanor offense, it may be appropriate to file a Pitchess motion in cases where the defense believes that the defendant was the victim of some form of police misconduct, including excessive force, racial profiling, coerced confession, planted evidence or a false police report. When the defendant has grounds to believe that he or she was the victim of official misconduct, a Pitchess motion requests a review of the involved officer’s personnel file. This evidence can be critical when mounting a police misconduct defense.

The defense would submit a written Pitchess motion to the Court and must provide notice to the agency that controls the personnel records sought. The motion must identify the case, defendant, officer involved and relevant law enforcement agency, a description of the records that are sought, a showing of “good cause” justifying the release of the personnel records and proof that the defense has notified the relevant law enforcement agency of the Pitchess motion.

Typically, the biggest hurdle in a Pitchess motion is the showing of good cause that the defense is required to make. Usually this is accomplished with an affidavit that describes the facts of the defendant’s case, the alleged misconduct and reasons why the misconduct is material to the defendant’s case. There may be cases where the officer’s misconduct may have had no effect on the defendant’s case. In these situations, the judge will likely deny the defendant’s Pitchess motion.

If the judge finds that there is good cause to support the Pitchess motion, the Court would then hold an “in camera” review of the officer’s personnel file. This review is conducted privately in the judge’s chambers. The judge will review the file to see if there is any material relevant to the defense. The prosecutor and defense counsel are not present during this in camera review. The only parties who can attend this review are the officer involved, a representative for the agency involved or other parties the officer allows to be present.

The Court is prohibited from releasing certain personnel evidence to the defense, including information about misconduct that occurred over five years before the alleged misconduct in the current case, conclusions made by the officer or agency that investigated the misconduct and facts that are considered remote and would not have a benefit but would be overly prejudicial.

If the judge ultimately grants the defendant’s Pitchess motion, the Court may release complaints that are deemed relevant to the defense. The Court generally does not turn over the actual complaints, but will provide the defense with the name and contact information of the individual who initially filed the successful complaint against the officer. The defense would then be able to locate this witness and interview him or her or call him or her as a potential defense witness in the current case. If the original complainant is unavailable or has no memory of the initial complaint, the defendant can obtain the actual record of the complaint from the officer’s personnel file. When the defendant’s Pitchess motion is granted, the prosecution may be willing to dismiss or significantly reduce the charges in light of this evidence. In other cases, the prosecution will opt to go forward with charges.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense and believe that you were the victim of police misconduct, it is critical that you discuss your case with a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney right away. As a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience, Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut is highly skilled at litigating Pitchess motions on behalf of clients who were the victims of police misconduct.

For more information about Los Angeles Pitchess motions, contact Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut at the Kraut Law Group located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Client Reviews
He gave me the peace of mind that my DUI case was going to be resolved. He fought for what it was needed and helped me by answering all my questions. Mike is not an average attorney. He’s a very experienced, honest and straightforward person that is there for you!
★★★★★
I hired Attorney Mike Kraut and I'm am so happy and grateful that I did! I was arrested for a DUI because my BAC level was over the .08 limit. I ended up getting a wet and reckless instead of a DUI. I still have to do some classes and I'm on probation, but I do not have a DUI on my record. If you have a DUI hire Attorney Kraut, he definitely knows his stuff!
★★★★★
Avvo User
There aren't enough positive words to write about Mike, but let me be clear that this is the only lawyer worth hiring in Los Angeles. Mike is professional, caring, and an absolute champion at winning in court.
★★★★★
Kyle, Avvo User
Mike Kraut is not a typical lawyer. He is a straightforward person with a true heart and a sympathetic ear. He is also smart and connected and he cares about the people who seek out his help. He got my son out of a jam. He did it quickly and painlessly. I recommend Mike Kraut to anyone that needs his services.
Thank you Mike for helping my son.
★★★★★
Mark, Avvo User
Michael Kraut is a rock star lawyer. I was really happy and satisfied with the results I received from Michael and his team. A few months back I was being accused of a serious felony. Mike gave me sound legal advice and worked diligently to clear my name. Mike was great at always keeping me updated and returning calls. Great, great lawyer I cant say enough about this man!
★★★★★
Eric, Google User
How can I express how relieved and pleased I am with Michael's professional abilities to have my Felony brought down to a misdameanor to a possible dismissal with deferment. With his care my life has been turned around and cannot say how helpful he's been not only in my case but life. He, himself has changed how I view criminal lawyers. Thank you so much Michael!
★★★★★
Owen, Google User