Driving Under the Influence and “Self-Driving” Technology

Driving Under the Influence and “Self-Driving” Technology

“Self-driving” technology is becoming increasingly common in newer vehicles. Perhaps the most talked about self-driving technology can be found in Tesla electric vehicles, where “enhanced autopilot” software can steer, break, accelerate, change lanes, and execute other driving maneuvers on both the highway and surface streets. This “self-driving” technology found in Tesla and other vehicles, however, is not autonomous. It still requires the attentiveness and engagement of the driver. Accordingly, despite these advancements, it is illegal in California to get behind the wheel and operate a vehicle even if it is equipped with this technology, if under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both, and/or if you have a blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) of .08% or more.

Driving Under the Influence

Driving Under the Influence is typically charged as a misdemeanor in California. However, under certain circumstances, you can be charged with a felony DUI. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to DUIs involving prior DUI Arrests (fourth DUI offense), DUI with injury, and vehicle manslaughter.

California Vehicle Code sections 23152(a), (f), and (g) prohibits driving under the influence. To be found guilty of driving under the influence, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  1. The defendant drove a vehicle;

AND

  1. When the defendant drove, the defendant was under the influence of an alcoholic beverage, a drug, or the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and drug.

California Vehicle Code section 23152 (b) prohibits driving with a .08% blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”). To be found guilty of driving under the influence with a .08% BAC, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  1. The defendant drove a vehicle;

AND

  1. When the defendant drove, the defendant’s Blood Alcohol Concentration was .08% or more by weight.

California Vehicle Code sections 23153 pertain to DUI involving an injury. California Vehicle code section 23153 is a wobbler and can be charged as a felony or misdemeanor. The decision to charge as a felony or misdemeanor often depends on the extent of the injuries.

What Constitutes “Driving?”

“Driving” is somewhat of a misnomer. Vehicle Code sections 23152 requires does not require a defendant to have driven a specific distance or for a specific amount of time. Rather, all that is required for purposes of driving under the influence is “proof of volitional movement of a vehicle.” Mercer v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles (1991) 53 Cal.3d 753, 768. The “movement” in this instance may be slight. Padilla v. Meese (1986) 184 Cal.Appp.3d 1022, 1029. “Self-driving” technology is activated by the driver and once activated requires the driver’s engagement and interaction, all of which constitutes “driving” as defined for purposes of driving under the influence.

Driving Under the Influence is a serious allegation and a conviction could result in serious penalties and other consequences including jail time, extensive fines and fees, and the suspension of your driver’s license. If you or a family member has been charged with DUI in Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County, or Ventura County, it is imperative that you hire the best DUI defense attorney that you can. As a former Deputy District Attorney with over 14 years of prosecutorial experience, Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Michael Kraut knows how to effectively defend clients who have been accused of both felony and misdemeanor DUIs.

For more information about all types of DUIs, and to schedule your free consultation, contact attorney Michael Kraut at the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1520, Los Angeles, CA 90028. Mr. Kraut can be reached 24/7 at 888-334-6344 or 323-464-6453.

Share |
Featured on CNN
ABC News
NBC News
Los Angeles Times
CBS News
Today
The New York Times
Us Weekly
Entertainment Tonight
Good Morning America
Legal Broadcast Network
Avvo Rating 10.0
Client Reviews
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is outstanding! He genuinely cared about my case and instructed my mom and I throughout the entire process. He was very clear on what he needed in order to receive the best results. He kept us updated until the end. I thank him so much for getting my charges rejected. I highly recommend him to anyone with legal needs! Shaquan
★★★★★
I contacted Michael with concern for my personal and business reputation. He was very reassuring and confident the entire time. After about 3 weeks it was determined that no charges were being filed by any agency and I was in the clear of any investigation. One thing that is amazing is just how FAST Michael is at replying to phone calls, texts, and even emails! We are talking under 30 minutes in most cases. That is unheard of for most attorneys! Michael is incredible and not your typical run of the mill attorney. For best results hire him if you feel like you might be under investigation or could face charges. Even if you know you are innocent it is best to take care of the smoke before it becomes a fire. Brad
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is-hands down-the best criminal defense attorney and I can't begin to thank him for all that he did for me and my family. I reached out to him in the middle of the night and less than a couple hours later, he had gotten back to me and scheduled a meeting. He's a no-nonsense attorney who knows how to get the job done! From the second we retained him, I had peace of mind in knowing that we were in the best hands possible. If Michael Kraut couldn't get it done, I knew that it couldn't be done at all. You can't put a price tag on your freedom. He was worth every single penny. Lida
★★★★★
Michael Kraut is an outstanding attorney. He was extremely professional, and straightforward, yet sensitive with my case. I am confident I made the right choice by hiring Michael. I highly recommend him to anyone seeking a truly experienced lawyer. Daniel
★★★★★
Michael Kraut - I cannot thank you enough for all that you did for ​my son. When I came to you I read that you used to be a district attorney but I never knew how much that meant until I watch you in court. I knew it took 3 months but the final day when I heard the judge say that all charges were dismissed it was all worth it! I will always be grateful for all that you did for us. A.N.